ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating attractor dynamics and connectivity features for EEG-based dementia classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise differentiation between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents a clinical challenge, as both conditions share overlapping symptoms yet diverge in their pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment strategies. Electroencephalography (EEG), characterized by its higher temporal resolution and widespread applicability, provides the opportunity to uncover subtle discrepancies in brain dynamics that may be difficult to detect with conventional neuroimaging techniques. This paper presents a system that combines nonlinear attractor-based features derived from phase-space representations with phase-locking value connectivity features to encapsulate both local and global brain dynamics. In this regard, resting-state EEG recordings from 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29 healthy controls (HC) were preprocessed and analyzed to extract dynamic and network features. Multiple classifiers were then used to assess these features under stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The results showed that the support vector machine achieved the highest performance for AD vs. FTD (81.7%), logistic regression performed well for FTD vs. HC (81.0%), and gradient boosting reached 82.9% for AD vs. HC. These findings illustrate the capability of EEG as a low-cost diagnostic technique, suggest that attractor dynamics and connectivity can offer complementary perspectives on the brain alterations linked to dementia, and enhance classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.