Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling mechanical properties of rubberized concrete using gene expression programming (GEP) and random forest: a comparative study.

Muhammad Sheraz, Muhammad Talha, Muhammad Alam, Muhammad Farhan, Zia Ul Haq, Muhammad Rashid, Hisham Alabduljabbar, Furqan Ahmad

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad SherazDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan. engr.sheraz@uetmardan.edu.pk.
Muhammad TalhaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Muhammad AlamDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Muhammad FarhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Zia Ul HaqDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Muhammad RashidDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Hisham AlabduljabbarDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 11942, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Furqan AhmadUNHCR, Kabul, Afghanistan. engr.furqanahmad123@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubberized concrete is becoming increasingly popular as a sustainable construction material due to its capacity to repurpose waste tyre rubber (WTR) and reduce the use of natural aggregates. However, experimental testing of its mechanical properties is expensive and time-consuming, emphasizing the importance of reliable predictive tools. To solve this issue, this research uses gene expression programming (GEP) and random forest (RF) models to estimate the flexural strength (FS) and split tensile strength (STS) of rubberized concrete. The development of the models were carried out using a comprehensive dataset that included 112 experimental findings and seven main input parameters. Multiple statistical metrics were used to evaluate model performance, such as R, MAE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE. Although both models correctly predicted the strength trends of rubberized concrete, RF outperformed GEP with testing R² values of 0.9799 for FS and 0.9817 for STS, compared to 0.9183 and 0.8965, respectively. The error analysis revealed that both models’ prediction errors were within acceptable bounds, with RF models having lower error as compared to GEP. Furthermore, the proposed models were compared to previously published prediction models and outperformed them in terms of accuracy and generality. Furthermore, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis applied to the dataset revealed the relative importance of input parameters on mechanical behavior. The findings show that machine learning-based techniques are successful at predicting the mechanical properties of rubberized concrete and have the potential to enhance environmentally friendly construction through the efficient reuse of WTR.

Indexed as

Construction MaterialsRubberFlexural StrengthRandom ForestTensile StrengthRubberGene expression programmingMachine learningMechanical propertiesRandom forestRubberized concreteWaste tyre

Identifiers

PMID41772026
PMCPMC12979604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.