ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating routing stability and coordination in swarm-based multi-agent task-oriented dialogue systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early-warning industrial fault detection based on physics-guided residual learning and calibrated CRNNs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FUSION-AD: interpretable AI framework for risk assessment and subgroup discovery in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Smart sensing-enabled risk-aware nitrogen prescriptions via conformal profit bounds for precision agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conversational systems are becoming a primary interface for services and enterprise automation, and rapid market growth is pushing deployments into safety- and cost-sensitive settings. Reliability remains a bottleneck when interactions span multiple domains: an orchestrator must choose the next specialist, maintain shared dialogue state, and recover from mistakes before they cascade across handoffs. Despite rising interest in swarm-like multi-agent designs, orchestration is rarely evaluated with coordination-centric metrics, making it hard to compare routing policies beyond surface fluency. We present an evaluation-first pipeline for multi-domain task-oriented dialogue on MultiWOZ 2.2 that decouples routing from generation and exposes measurable failure modes. A DeBERTa-based router selects domain specialists, while a FLAN-T5 generator produces structured actions and belief-state updates under a shared memory interface. The protocol tracks delegation correctness, slot-progress coverage, switching and bouncing instability, loop behavior, and recovery after misroutes, and it links early-turn errors to downstream collapse using cascading-error attribution. We further introduce stress tests that simulate reformulation, long-horizon corrections, and tool-latency delays to probe robustness beyond static annotations. Across routing variants, confidence-aware gating yields the strongest stability improvement, achieving routing accuracy of 0.77 while substantially reducing handoff churn, with switching 0.11 and bounce 0.01, relative to a learned baseline with 0.65 accuracy, switching 0.44, and bounce 0.09. At the same time, confidence gating can trade progress for precision when it suppresses belief updates, highlighting an accuracy-progress tension that is important for deployment tuning. Diagnostic summaries identify misrouting and empty-state updates as dominant contributors, while looping is comparatively rare. Finally, applying the same evaluation to SGD shows that coordination challenges persist under schema shift. Overall, the proposed metrics and implementation blueprint provide a reproducible basis for diagnosing coordination failures and selecting orchestration policies for deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.