ArticleScientific reports2026
Blockchain-enabled traceability evaluation framework for mineral resource development and utilization: a fuzzy comprehensive assessment approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective traceability management in mineral resource development faces persistent challenges including information asymmetry, data falsification, and verification difficulties across complex value chains. This paper proposes a comprehensive blockchain-enabled traceability evaluation framework integrating distributed ledger technology with systematic assessment methodologies. A four-layer architecture encompassing data acquisition, blockchain storage, analysis processing, and evaluation application is designed to ensure data integrity throughout the mineral lifecycle. A hierarchical indicator system spanning five dimensions-traceability breadth, depth, precision, timeliness, and data credibility-is constructed, with the Analytic Hierarchy Process employed for weight determination and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation applied for performance assessment. Empirical validation through case study analysis of Huaxin Mining Group demonstrates the framework's practical applicability, yielding a comprehensive traceability score of 81.2 (Good grade). Comparative analysis reveals that blockchain-based systems achieve 96.8% data accuracy versus 82.4% for traditional approaches, with trace-back efficiency improving from 127.3 min to 4.7 min. The blockchain technology contribution ratio reaches 47.3% toward maximum traceability improvement. These findings provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for advancing transparent and accountable mineral resource governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.