ArticleScientific reports2026
Image-based detection of bolts and bolt-missing defects in multi-angle and complex background scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bolted connections are widely adopted as primary structural joints in engineering infrastructure. However, conventional manual inspection remains labor-intensive and time-consuming. Deep learning-based automated defect detection faces significant challenges due to pronounced image variability induced by variable camera angles, lighting conditions, partial occlusions, and complex backgrounds. This study addresses these issues by constructing a diverse bolt image dataset compiled from three sources: on-site acquisitions from suspension bridges, field photography of steel transmission towers, and controlled laboratory imaging of a custom-fabricated bolt assembly model. To enhance data robustness, we employed image enhancement techniques and generative adversarial networks (GANs) for data augmentation. A comparative analysis was conducted among three mainstream object-detection models-YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv10-using recall, precision, and mean average precision (mAP) as evaluation metrics. Building upon the superior performance of YOLOv8 (mAP = 0.91, recall = 0.85, precision = 0.9), we proposed an enhanced architecture integrating a Swin-Transformer backbone and a novel Multi-Scale and Detail-Enhanced Module (MEDM) to specifically improve missing-bolt detection in challenging visual contexts. The improved model demonstrated consistent accuracy across diverse scenarios: 100% at 15°, 30°, and 45° viewing angles; > 94% under 30%, 50%, and 100% illumination levels; and > 97.2% for colored coatings (blue, red, white) against complex grassy and mixed backgrounds. In practical engineering deployment, the model achieved a 98.94% detection rate across 12,772 bolt sets, successfully identifying one instances of missing bolts. These findings validate the proposed approach's effectiveness for real-world structural health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.