ArticleScientific reports2026
Association between knee angles at initial contact and post-landing knee ranges of motion in athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Altered knee kinematics is associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury risk. Knee angle at initial contact (AIC) and range of motion (RoM) after landing are often used interchangeably as ACL risk indicators, yet their relationship remains unclear. Moreover, no consensus exists about the time window to be considered for the RoM. This study explored the degree of association between knee AIC and two RoMs (unstandardized: from IC to maximum knee flexion angle, ARoMFULL; standardized: within 100 milliseconds after IC, defining a Risk Time Window for ACL injury, ARoMRTW). Eleven ACL-reconstructed soccer players and 20 healthy controls performed Single Leg Hop (SLH) and Single Leg Cross Drop Landing (SLCDL) tasks on a force plate. Knee kinematics was recorded in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. Correlation analysis showed moderate-to-very-high positive correlations between ARoMFULL and ARoMRTW across all tasks, limbs, and planes (r: 0.56–0.99), supporting their similarity in capturing early post-landing motion. Conversely, significant correlations between AIC and both RoMs were only found in frontal plane (r: 0.48–0.69), suggesting that AIC alone may not reliably reflect knee dynamics after impact. Since ACL injuries typically occur within 100 ms post-landing, ARoMRTW may offer a practical metric for injury screening and rehabilitation monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.