ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliable ECG classification using parallel hybrid models with limited resources.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ScaHybNet: a scalogram-based hybrid ensemble network for ECG arrhythmia classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accuracy in classification of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is vital in healthcare for diagnosing arrhythmias and other cardiovascular disorders. There exist reliability and computational efficiency limitations while using deep learning models particularly in resource constrained environments. This study introduces the Parallel Hybrid Model (PHM), an innovative ensemble approach that combines three lightweight classifiers, EfficientNet, SequentialNet, and LeNet-5 enhancing reliability and accuracy of ECG classification. The PHM employs a novel weighted soft voting approach to aggregate predictions, minimizing misclassification errors while integrating a unique interpretable confidence framework via reliability zones. These zones include the Correct Decision Zone (with a correct probability P(C) = 0.9645), the Misclassification Zone (with an error probability P(E) = 0.0076), and the False Decision Zone (with a false decision probability P(F) = 0.0279), offering a clear measure of confidence. The proposed PHM model is evaluated on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, achieving an accuracy of 98.46%, outperforming individual models (LeNet-5: 98.13%, EfficientNet: 97.92%, SequentialNet: 98.08%), with an error rate of 1.54%. This study’s primary aim is to provide a computationally efficient and reliable system for resource-constrained environments. This reliability focused approach ensures robustness in performance in resource-limited devices such as wearable ECGs, offering clinicians dependable and interpretable outcomes for improved diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.