Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effects of rice bran arabinoxylan compound on quality of life of cancer patients during active treatment: a randomised placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rice Bran Arabinoxylan Compound and Tryptophan Metabolism on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the RBAC-QoL Study.International journal of tryptophan research : IJTR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of a plant-based immunomodulator, rice bran arabinoxylan compound (RBAC), on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients during active treatment are unclear. The RBAC-QoL study was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind feasibility study to address the role of RBAC in cancer patients receiving systemic therapies. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported functional, symptom, and global QoL scores. Secondary and exploratory outcome measures included nutritional indices and cytokine changes. Adult patients (n = 29) with solid organ tumours (≥ stage II) undergoing systemic treatment were recruited from outpatient centres in New South Wales, Australia. Group allocation was assigned through stratified randomisation (RBAC = 12, placebo = 17). Interventions were either RBAC or matched placebo at 3 g/day for 24 weeks. The participants, oncologists, and data collectors were blinded. Data were collected from five study visits, 6 weeks apart. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using repeated measure ANOVA with pairwise comparisons where statistical significance was observed. Data sets not conforming to normality were tested with nonparametric ANOVA-type statistics. The global QoL scores differed significantly between groups with a large effect size (p = 0.031, eta2[g] = 0.147). Pairwise comparisons found significant differences favouring the RBAC group at week 6 (p = 0.017, Cohen’s d = 1.119) and week 24 (p = 0.041, d = 0.970). Compared to the placebo group, the RBAC group showed significantly better role (p < 0.001) and social functioning (p = 0.037), while the cognitive functioning score difference was trending higher (p = 0.055). Regarding cancer symptoms, the placebo group reported significantly worse scores (p < 0.05) in fatigue, pain, dyspnoea, and appetite loss compared to the RBAC group. Significant elevations (p < 0.05) of cytokine interferon-γ, interleukin 1RA and 12p40, as well as total protein, were also detected in the RBAC group compared to placebo over time. These serum markers correlated positively with the global QoL scores, suggesting potential interactions of immune activity, nutritional status, and QoL. No intervention-related adverse events were reported in both groups. RBAC improves QoL beyond placebo during systemic cancer treatment, potentially through the immuno-nutritional pathway.Trial registration: Prospective registration on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Reg No: ACTRN12619000562178p, 10/04/2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.