ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based assessment of offshore wind farm impacts on soft-bottom benthic communities in the Shandong Peninsula.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Offshore Wind Turbine Mapping in 2025 Using the CPEF Framework and Sentinel-1 SAR.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Offshore wind power, as a crucial component of clean energy, is rapidly expanding globally; however, the long-term impact mechanisms on marine benthic ecosystems remain unclear. This study focuses on four offshore wind farms (South 3, South 4, Site V, and Site U1) in the southern waters of the Shandong Peninsula. Based on benthic organism survey data and multi-source remote sensing environmental data from 2015 to 2024, a remote sensing-in-situ integrated machine learning prediction framework was constructed to systematically assess the spatiotemporal impact of wind farm construction and operation on soft-bottom benthic communities. The study employed the XGBoost model as the main model and the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) as the baseline model, using SHAP interpretability analysis to reveal key driving factors. The results show that the XGBoost model achieved an R² of 0.742 on the test set, significantly outperforming the GAM model (R²=0.625). The years in operation (YSI) was the most important factor affecting benthic community diversity; after a brief disturbance during the initial construction phase, the community showed a significant recovery trend after 2–4 years of operation. The artificial reef effect caused by the conversion to hard bottom near the pile foundations resulted in an approximately 13% increase in the Shannon diversity index and an approximately 40% increase in species richness compared to the control area. This study provides a reproducible methodological framework for the ecological impact assessment of offshore wind farms, and the findings can provide scientific basis for the environmentally friendly layout planning of offshore wind power in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.