ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating resolution requirements for subtle caenorhabditis elegans strain discrimination using classical descriptors and CNN-transformer models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately distinguishing subtle phenotypic differences between Caenorhabditis elegans strains remains a major challenge in functional genetics and behavioural studies. Here, we evaluate how image resolution affects strain discrimination using an automated Multiview system combining macroscopic plate-level imaging with high-resolution microscopic single-worm recordings. Three strains were analysed: wild-type N2, a transgenic line with mild dysfunction of GABAergic neurons leading to subtle locomotor alterations (vltIs66), and a strongly uncoordinated mutant strain (unc-1(vlt10)). The three strains were analysed using traditional locomotion and shape descriptors. While both imaging modalities detected clear differences for the strongly uncoordinated unc-1(vlt10) strain, no traditional morphometric and kinematic descriptors reliably separated vltIs66 from N2. We then trained a CNN-Transformer directly on image sequences. When trained on macro-camera data, the model failed to discriminate between N2 and vltIs66, whereas the same architecture trained on micro-camera sequences achieved robust separation, revealing phenotype-specific patterns not captured by conventional descriptors. To quantify the impact of spatial detail, micro-camera recordings were progressively downscaled by factors of 2, 4, 8 and 16 and the model was retrained at each effective resolution. This resolution sweep showed that performance remains stable under moderate downsampling but degrades markedly at coarse resolutions, indicating a minimum effective pixel density required for subtle phenotype classification. These findings highlight the importance of high-resolution, sequence-based deep learning for detecting fine locomotor differences in C. elegans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.