ArticleScientific reports2026
Modelling lung and muscle oxygen diffusion capacities from sea-level to Mount Everest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From adaptation to maladaptation: regulatory reserve and ventilatory control responses to high altitude.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung and muscle oxygen diffusion capacities (DLO2 and DMO2, respectively) are difficult to measure at maximal-intensity exercise and at altitude and they are scarcely reported in the literature, yet they are key components of the O2 transport cascade. The goal of the present study was to compute DLO2 and DMO2 at simulated increasing altitudes between sea-level and Mount Everest. Literature data were compiled to compute DLO2 and DMO2 at maximal exercise using a forward iterative algorithm. These computations were repeated every 250 m of increasing altitude between seal level and the altitude of Mount Everest. Computed DLO2 increased from sea-level to 5500 m and then decreased to the altitude of Mount Everest; yet remaining higher than sea-level values. DMO2 increased from sea-level to 3500 m and then progressively decreased to values lower than sea-level. The computed variations in DLO2 and DMO2 fit with the ability of the lung and muscle to increase their diffusion capacity at altitude, which seemingly indicates an existing diffusion capacity reserve. The muscle reserve seems depleted at a lower altitude than the lung reserve. The clinical relevance of the proposed model requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.