Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Gelatin production from red tilapia skin fish using high-pressure processing and its characterisations.

Irwandi Jaswir, Nurlina Yusof, Yuliana, Miftahul Khair, Minda Azhar, Rahadian Zainul, Widya Lestari, Ridar Hendri, Anton Komaini, Kazuo Miyashita and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Irwandi JaswirInternational Halal Research Centre, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia. irwandi@iium.edu.my.
Nurlina YusofBioprocess and Molecular Engineering Research Unit (BPMERU), Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Gombak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
YulianaFaculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Miftahul KhairDepartment of Chemistry, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Minda AzharDepartment of Chemistry, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Rahadian ZainulDepartment of Chemistry, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Widya LestariFaculty of Dentistry, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan, 25200, Pahang, Malaysia.
Ridar HendriFaculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Anton KomainiFaculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Kazuo MiyashitaHokkaido Bunkyo University, Kogane-chuo 5-196-1, Eniwa City, 061-1449, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ahmad Muhammad SalamatullahDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agriculturan Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mustofa AhdaFaculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin is a key ingredient widely used in the food industry. In recent years, alternative sources of gelatin, such as fish skin, have been explored. However, traditional extraction methods are time-consuming and environmentally harmful. High-Pressure Processing (HPP) has emerged as a novel and eco-friendly approach for gelatin extraction. Using HPP can reduce processing time and chemical waste, while also enhancing the properties and yield of gelatin. Gelatin produced through HPP method yields 1.24 times more than the conventional method (yields: 32.1 ± 1.81% and 25.8 ± 1.24%, respectively). Besides, gelatin concentration of both methods is not different significanly. Moreover, the functional groups and protein composition of gelatin obtained by the conventional and HPP methods are identical. This study found that HPP produces gelatin with a spongy microstructure and excellent gel strength. Notably, gelatin extracted from red tilapia using HPP exhibited a 1.45-fold higher gel strength than that extracted by the conventional method (gel strength 184 g and 128 g, respectively). However, applying high pressure (350 MPa) reduces the amino acid content of the extracted gelatin. This study determined that a pressure of 250 MPa is optimal for producing gelatin with desirable characteristics using the HPP method. To achieve high-quality gelatin from fish skin, further optimisation of the HPP process is necessary.

Indexed as

GelatinSkinTilapiaAmino AcidsAnimalsPressureAmino AcidsGelatinAmino acid levelsEco-friendly extractionFish gelatinGel strength

Identifiers

PMID41771933
PMCPMC13201572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.