SynthesisNature communications2026
Risk of cervical cancer and high-grade lesions in vulnerable women a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Regional Pathology-Detection Trends in High-Grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Women Aged 40-69 Years in Northern Norway, 1998-2025.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer is largely preventable, yet causes around 300,000 deaths annually, disproportionately affecting vulnerable women. In here, we aim to estimate the risk of high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer among vulnerable populations in high- and upper-middle-income countries. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up to February 2024 (from 2004 for HIV) across four databases. Risk of bias is assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We include women with low socioeconomic status, migrants, prisoners, sex workers, women with substance use disorders, mental illness, and living with HIV. The primary outcome is the pooled risk of cervical cancer and high-grade lesions; the secondary outcome is subgroup-specific risk. The analysis focuses on biologically defined females, with sex determined by author reporting. In this work, based on 127 studies, we show that vulnerable women face higher risks of cervical cancer (RR2.78; 95%CI 2.32-3.32) and high-grade lesions (RR 2.5; 95%CI 2.05-3.04), with high heterogeneity supporting equity-focused prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.