Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771908›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

ReactionSeek: LLM-powered literature data mining and knowledge discovery in organic synthesis.

Jiawei Li, Minzhou Li, Qi Yang, Sanzhong Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiawei LiCenter of Basic Molecular Science, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8858-8310
Minzhou LiCenter of Basic Molecular Science, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qi YangCenter of Basic Molecular Science, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yangqi@hlsct.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3198-1619
Sanzhong LuoCenter of Basic Molecular Science, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. luosz@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-4047

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22031006; 22373056; 22393891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to chemical discovery is critically hindered by the inaccessibility of data locked within unstructured scientific literature. Existing data acquisition methods are often manual, limited in scope, or require extensive custom software development, impeding progress in leveraging AI for chemical discovery. Here, we introduce ReactionSeek, a framework that synergistically combines large language models (LLMs) with established cheminformatics tools to automate multi-modal data mining from organic synthesis literature. Through sophisticated prompt engineering with minimal custom code, ReactionSeek extracts and standardizes complex textual, graphical, and semantic chemical information. We validate this framework on the century-spanning Organic Syntheses collection, achieving over 95% precision and recall for key reaction parameters. This enables three applications: the generation of a large, AI-ready dataset; an interactive Synthetic Chatbot (SynChat) for natural language querying of chemical data; and an autonomous analysis that revealed decades-long trends in catalysis. ReactionSeek thus provides a general solution to the data curation bottleneck, representing a step forward in for AI-driven archive mining and knowledge discovery across the chemical sciences.

Identifiers

PMID41771908
PMCPMC13066619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.