ArticleNature communications2026
ReactionSeek: LLM-powered literature data mining and knowledge discovery in organic synthesis.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to chemical discovery is critically hindered by the inaccessibility of data locked within unstructured scientific literature. Existing data acquisition methods are often manual, limited in scope, or require extensive custom software development, impeding progress in leveraging AI for chemical discovery. Here, we introduce ReactionSeek, a framework that synergistically combines large language models (LLMs) with established cheminformatics tools to automate multi-modal data mining from organic synthesis literature. Through sophisticated prompt engineering with minimal custom code, ReactionSeek extracts and standardizes complex textual, graphical, and semantic chemical information. We validate this framework on the century-spanning Organic Syntheses collection, achieving over 95% precision and recall for key reaction parameters. This enables three applications: the generation of a large, AI-ready dataset; an interactive Synthetic Chatbot (SynChat) for natural language querying of chemical data; and an autonomous analysis that revealed decades-long trends in catalysis. ReactionSeek thus provides a general solution to the data curation bottleneck, representing a step forward in for AI-driven archive mining and knowledge discovery across the chemical sciences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.