ArticleScientific data2026
Unfair Inequality in Education: A Benchmark for AI-Fairness Research.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unfair Inequality in Education: A Benchmark for AI-Fairness Research.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel benchmark dataset designed to support fairness-oriented research in artificial intelligence within the educational domain. The dataset originates from longitudinal survey data collected by the Agencia Canaria de Calidad Universitaria y Evaluación Educativa, encompassing comprehensive information from students, families, and teachers across the Canary Islands, Spain. It includes detailed student profiles and academic trajectories, covering multiple years of academic performance outcomes. The original data is characterised by a high-dimensional and sparse feature space, which presents challenges for direct application in AI workflows. To address these challenges while minimising the risk of introducing bias during preprocessing, we provide a curated version of the dataset specifically tailored for AI applications. This version preserves the statistical properties of the original data and is accompanied by detailed documentation of the preprocessing steps, including strategies for dimensionality reduction and fairness preservation. The dataset is intended as a resource for the research community, enabling studies on fairness, predictive modeling, and educational analytics. We describe its structure, content, and preparation process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.