ArticleNature communications2026
Unifying non-Markovian dynamics and agent heterogeneity in scalable stochastic networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gillespie-based simulation and inference for non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Simulation and inference methods for non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stochastic processes underpin dynamics across biology, physics, epidemiology, and finance, yet accurately simulating them remains a major challenge. Classical approaches such as the Gillespie algorithm are exact for Markovian, time-independent systems, where propensities depend only on the current state and agents of a given type are statistically identical. While efficient, this framework misses a defining feature of many real systems: heterogeneity and memory at the level of individual agents. Cells may divide or differentiate on distinct intrinsic timescales, individuals may preferentially interact with specific partners, and inter-event-time distributions can deviate strongly from the exponential. We introduce MOSAIC (Modeling of Stochastic Agents with Individual Complexity), a general and scalable framework that embeds agent-specific properties directly into the dynamics. MOSAIC unifies heterogeneous rates, dynamic interaction preferences, and both Markovian and non-Markovian waiting-time distributions within a single stochastic formalism, while retaining Gillespie-like computational cost. Applications to delayed biochemical reactions, competitive immune-cell dynamics, and temporal social networks show that MOSAIC reproduces empirical features that existing methods either miss or capture only at prohibitive computational cost, establishing it as a practical tool for simulating heterogeneous stochastic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.