Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771854›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Embryo metabolite analysis and implantation potential prediction using chemiluminescent microfluidic chips with dielectric wetting valves.

Wenqiang Tong, Jiaming Shi, Zhihang Yu, Bin Ran, Jiaxi Du, Zhicheng Wang, Huixian Zhong, Qing Sun, Feng Xiong, Yonggang Zhu and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wenqiang TongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jiaming ShiCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhihang YuCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Bin RanCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jiaxi DuCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhicheng WangCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Huixian ZhongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Qing SunShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Feng XiongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yonggang ZhuCenter for Microflows and Nanoflows, School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. zhuyonggang@hit.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-9508
Peilin ChenShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China. chenpeilin1990@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-2872
Huaying ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. chenhuaying@hit.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-4362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of embryo metabolites offers a promising non-invasive strategy for assessing preimplantation developmental potential, yet the limited performance of current sensing platforms restricts physiological insights. Here we report a capillary-driven chemiluminescence microfluidic device equipped with three electrowetting valves, enabling simultaneous, offline quantification of glucose, lactate and pyruvate from as little as 3 μL of spent blastocyst culture medium (SBCM). Using a training set (n = 61) and validation set (n = 108) of human embryo transfers, we systematically recorded morphological development and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Metabolic flux analysis revealed that embryos with higher developmental potential consumed more glucose and pyruvate while producing more lactate. Integration of metabolic and morphological data yielded a predictive model of implantation potential with an area under the curve (AUC) of 92.0%, demonstrating robust performance. This platform establishes a powerful tool for embryo selection and may inform clinical decision-making in assisted reproduction.

Indexed as

BlastocystEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferLuminescent MeasurementsCulture Media, ConditionedFemaleGlucoseHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesLactic AcidPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy RatePyruvic AcidCulture Media, ConditionedGlucoseLactic AcidPyruvic Acid

Identifiers

PMID41771854
PMCPMC13065755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.