ArticleBDJ open2026
Effect of 980 nm diode laser irradiation in comparison with conventional irrigation on smear layer removal from radicular dentin-an in vitro experimental study.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe smear layer in radicular dentin reduces effective disinfection by occluding dentinal tubules and decreasing dentin permeability, contributing to persistent microbial infection and root canal treatment failures.
objectiveTo compare the effect of 980 nm Diode laser irradiation and conventional irrigation with Sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (NaOCl +EDTA) on smear layer removal in radicular dentin through dye penetration test. MATERIAL AND
methodsSixty-six extracted single-rooted permanent teeth were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I underwent 980 nm diode laser irradiation using a 200 µm fiber in helicoidal motion (2 W power, 200 Hz frequency, 1-4 ms pulse duration). Group II received conventional irrigation with 3% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA. All specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 48 h, after which cross-sections were obtained at 3, 5, and 8 mm from the anatomical apex. Dye penetration diameter (mm) and area (mm²) between the inner and outer circumferences were measured using ImageJ software under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests.
resultsThe diode laser irradiation demonstrated overall significantly greater dentinal tubule penetration (16.2 ± 1.91 mm) compared to the conventional irrigation (5.32 ± 0.70 mm; p = 0.001). The overall mean area of the laser group (12.61 ± 2.02 mm²) was greater as compared to the conventional group (1.67 ± 0.73 mm²; p = 0.001).
conclusionDiode laser irradiation may serve as an effective adjunct for smear layer removal and improved root canal disinfection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.