ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Beyond high-throughput: leveraging plant phenotyping to improve understanding and prediction of plant growth through process-based models.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating 3D phenotyping and functional-structural plant models for crop ideotype breeding.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The last decade has marked a period of rapid innovation in high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) of plants. This includes the establishment of robotic phenotyping infrastructure, development of new sensors, and improvements in computation for downstream analysis. While HTP approaches have revolutionized data collection, meaningful insights into plant function require a yet deeper connection between resultant HTP-based information and biological responses. We suggest that dynamic process-based plant models, which simulate growth and physiology in a time-explicit manner, can serve as a functional link between high-throughput methods and whole-plant mechanisms of growth. Using this framework, we review recent research that has leveraged HTP approaches for estimation of plant traits that are commonly used as process-based model (PBM) variables. Through this analysis, we review successes and identify emerging directions for future research. Finally, we highlight the varied ways that HTP can be used in conjunction with PBMs as a tool to advance discovery and improve prediction of plant growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.