Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771819›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Beyond high-throughput: leveraging plant phenotyping to improve understanding and prediction of plant growth through process-based models.

To-Chia Ting, D Scott Mackay, Jinha Jung, Matthew P Reynolds, Yang Yang, Diane R Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

To-Chia TingDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-7520
D Scott MackayDepartment of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14226, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-9755
Jinha JungSchool of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1176-3540
Matthew P ReynoldsInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, 56237, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-4316
Yang YangInstitute for Plant Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-5178
Diane R WangDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-3257

Funding

College of Agriculture, Purdue UniversityDirectorate for Biological Sciences PGRP #2102120National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67013-36205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has marked a period of rapid innovation in high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) of plants. This includes the establishment of robotic phenotyping infrastructure, development of new sensors, and improvements in computation for downstream analysis. While HTP approaches have revolutionized data collection, meaningful insights into plant function require a yet deeper connection between resultant HTP-based information and biological responses. We suggest that dynamic process-based plant models, which simulate growth and physiology in a time-explicit manner, can serve as a functional link between high-throughput methods and whole-plant mechanisms of growth. Using this framework, we review recent research that has leveraged HTP approaches for estimation of plant traits that are commonly used as process-based model (PBM) variables. Through this analysis, we review successes and identify emerging directions for future research. Finally, we highlight the varied ways that HTP can be used in conjunction with PBMs as a tool to advance discovery and improve prediction of plant growth.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysModels, BiologicalPlant DevelopmentPhenotypecarbon assimilationimage analysisnitrogen uptakephysiological modelingplant functional traitsspectral reflectancewater transport

Identifiers

PMID41771819
PMCPMC13062729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.