ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Influence of Language Barriers on Postoperative Recovery After Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding health related information is crucial for informed consent and active participation in surgical care. Language barriers between patients and health care professionals pose the risk of misunderstandings and incomplete information exchange. This can significantly impair the quality of health care. Little is known about the impact of language barriers in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery and its consequences for postoperative recovery.
methodWe performed a retrospective study in a University Medical Center in Germany assessing patients from 2020 to 2023 who underwent hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery. Primarily we investigated whether length of stay (LOS) differed between patients with and without language barrier. Secondary we examined (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) ERAS-compliance, preoperative education, postoperative mobilization habits, readmission, mortality, occurrence of complications, and certain postoperative complications between both groups.
resultsWe included 848 patients in our study, 57 (6.5%) patients of whom had a language barrier. The length of stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (12.8 days; (CI 95%: 11.9-13.7) versus 14.4 days; (CI 95%: 11.1-17.7) (p = 0.320). The interpreting service in our cohort was rarely used overall. Patients with language barriers were younger (CI 95%: 46.7-56.7 vs. 59.9-61.9; p = 0.001) and differed in terms of their diagnoses (p = 0.001). We found no differences in ERAS Compliance, complication rate and mortality. Among secondary outcomes, patients with language barriers showed higher rates of specific postoperative complications, including pulmonary embolism (p = 0.026), and paralytic ileus (p = 0.047). Patients without language barriers were more likely to be mobilized on day of surgery (p = 0.009) and received preoperative ERAS-education more frequently (p = 0.035).
conclusionPatients experiencing language barriers constitute a small group. Length of stay did not differ between the two groups. However, with respect to postoperative complications further investigation with larger patient cohorts is needed. Our findings emphasize the need for additional research and development of practical and patient-centered strategies to effectively address language barriers in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.