ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Rivaroxaban Initiation Timing and Clinical Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: An IPTW-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between early versus delayed rivaroxaban initiation and clinical outcomes in this population.MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 401 hospitalized AIS patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban between January 2019 and June 2024 were classified into early (≤7 days) or delayed (>7 days) initiation groups. Primary outcomes were excellent [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1] and good (mRS 0-2) functional outcomes at 90 days and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, clinically relevant major bleeding, all-cause mortality, composite outcomes, and in-hospital length of stay (LOS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied, followed by regression analyses. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.ResultsAfter IPTW adjustment, early rivaroxaban initiation was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving mRS 0-1 at 90 days (aOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.02-3.05) and 12 months (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.08-3.06), as well as a shorter LOS. No significant differences were observed for mRS 0-2 or other secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results, and subgroup analyses suggested a trend toward greater benefit among patients with higher baseline stroke severity (NIHSS >7).ConclusionEarly rivaroxaban initiation after AIS in patients with NVAF was associated with improved excellent functional outcomes without an apparent increase in adverse events, supporting its potential feasibility in routine practice and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.