ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Modeling Polymeric Drug Release: The Emerging Role of Machine Learning.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Hydrogels of Gelatin/O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan in Ovule Form with Curcumin and Retinyl Palmitate as a Treatment for Cervical Cancer.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Modeling Polymeric Drug Release: The Emerging Role of Machine Learning.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymeric drug formulations have significantly improved the safety, efficacy, and clinical impact of many therapies. A persistent challenge for formulation scientists, however, lies in accurately characterizing time-dependent drug release. For decades, researchers have relied on mathematical and physical principles, with a focus on transport phenomena, to interpret release kinetics from various polymeric systems using mechanistic and empirical models. While these models provide a foundational understanding through equations relating diffusion, swelling, and erosion, they often depend on simplifying assumptions and are often limited to a retrospective analysis of in vitro data. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have since opened the door for a new frontier in modeling strategies. Specifically, machine learning (ML) is being used not only to characterize drug release but also predict it while unveiling key formulation parameters governing unique kinetic profiles. This approach can support faster and more efficient development of polymeric systems. In this review, we explore how traditional drug release models have set the stage for ML in drug delivery research. We discuss important trends across recent ML applications, including data compilation, processing, architecture selection, and performance metrics. This perspective aims to provide scientists with a practical roadmap of ML applications used in formulation development. By integrating these tools with established knowledge, researchers can advance the design and translation of the next generation of polymer-based drug delivery systems. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.