ArticleOpen heart2026
Worse risk profile, number of grafts and hospital death but acceptable late survival in females undergoing coronary surgery: a 20-year propensity matched analysis.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate sex differences in perioperative characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and long-term survival following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
methodsProspective data were collected for all patients undergoing isolated CABG at a single centre during 2001-2021. Baseline characteristics were adjusted between females and males using 1:1 propensity score matching (nearest-neighbour, without replacement). Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed long-term survival. A predefined sub-analysis assessed risk mitigation associated with using off-pump CABG (OPCABG) in females in the matched cohort.
resultsPrematching, 11 563 males and 2573 females were included. Females were older with higher prevalences of class III-IV angina, hypertension and diabetes. After matching, 2573 patients per group were analysed, with standardised mean differences <0.1 for all covariates. Females had fewer left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafts (84% vs 88%, p<0.001), fewer total grafts (median 2 vs 3, p<0.001), higher in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 1.3%, OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.71, p=0.011) and longer hospital stays (median 7 days vs 6 days, beta 0.51, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90, p=0.01). Long-term survival was similar (stratified log-rank p=0.79). OPCABG mitigated the risk of in-hospital mortality in females (1.1% males vs 1.6% females, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.43, p=0.32; 1.6% OPCABG females vs 3.0% on-pump females, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91, p=0.021).
conclusionsFemales suffer higher in-hospital mortality and receive fewer LIMA and total number of grafts than males; however, 20-year survival is similar. OPCABG protects females from in-hospital mortality. A new female-tailored peri-operative care approach is warranted for females undergoing CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.