ArticleBMJ open2026
Role of Devine gastric partitioning in locally advanced gastric cancer: palliation and bridge to definitive care-protocol for a systematic review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric outlet obstruction syndrome (GOOS) is a clinically significant condition often associated with advanced malignancies, particularly gastric and pancreatic cancers. Management strategies focus on symptom relief, nutritional improvement and quality of life enhancement. Surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), especially laparoscopic GJ, is commonly recommended for patients with good functional status and life expectancy exceeding 2 months. The modified Devine partial stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PSPG) was introduced to address functional limitations of conventional GJ, including duodenogastric reflux and afferent loop syndrome. However, PSPG has not been widely adopted, and its role in malignant GOOS remains unclear.This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the application, functional outcomes and oncological implications of the modified Devine technique in malignant GOOS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PICO framework was employed to define eligibility criteria, focusing on studies examining PSPG for malignant GOOS as palliative surgery or a bridge to resection. Literature searches were conducted across Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature sources using a prospectively registered search strategy, between August and October 2025, following protocol submission. Two independent reviewers will screen articles, extract data and assess quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale where applicable. Data will be synthesised narratively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study is a systematic review of published literature, formal ethical approval was not strictly required. In accordance with institutional policy, the protocol was submitted to the Institutional Review Board of Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, which confirmed that the study met criteria for ethical exemption. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. REGISTRATION: This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024593540). Search strategy is registered in searchRxiv https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024593540 SEARCH STRATEGY REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.