ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
Proteomic Signatures of Cellular Reprogramming in Bladder Cancer: Insights into the Acquisition of Cancer Stem-like States and Phenotypic Plasticity.
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reprogramming-driven Proteomic Shifts Mirror Bladder Cancer Progression and Reveal Biomarker Candidates Across Disease Grades.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimReprogramming somatic cells to an embryonic state opens a transformative pathway to convert cancer cells into benign ones. By delving into the changes that occur during this process, we can enhance our understanding of tumor development and unlock groundbreaking therapeutic strategies. In this study, we successfully reprogrammed the bladder cancer cell line using Yamanaka factors and conducted a stage-specific, comprehensive proteomic analysis of the resulting molecular changes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe bladder cancer cell line HTB-4 was reprogrammed and cultured on vitronectin-coated surfaces following Sendai virus reprogramming, enabling a thorough evaluation of pluripotent marker expression. Both parental and reprogrammed cells were tested for proliferation, migration, invasion, and colony formation. nLC-MS/MS analysis was performed to identify molecular differences between parental bladder cancer cells and reprogrammed cells across initial passages.
resultsReprogrammed HTB-4 cells retain their ability to adhere and exhibit significant expression of pluripotency-associated proteins, forming colony-like structures. Stage-specific proteomic analyses reveal notable differences between reprogrammed cells and progenitor cells, particularly in pathways related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stem cell maintenance, and differentiation.
conclusionWe developed an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.