Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771536›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Knee Cartilage Segmentation Using a Swin-UNet Conditional Generative Adversarial Network: Development and Validation Study.

Jun Young Park, Ji-Hoon Nam, Shakhboz Abdigapporov, Jong-Keun Kim, Yong-Gon Koh, Byung Woo Cho, Hyuck Min Kwon, Kwan Kyu Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jun Young Park *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-4036
Ji-Hoon Nam *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-0945
Shakhboz AbdigapporovClevion Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2721-9817
Jong-Keun KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HeungK Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-8732
Yong-Gon KohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Center, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-1061
Byung Woo ChoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7472-4103
Hyuck Min KwonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-280X
Kwan Kyu ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0514-3257
Kyoung-Tak KangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-4576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate segmentation of cartilage from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for the diagnosis and surgical planning of knee osteoarthritis. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming, and conventional computed tomography-based surgical systems are limited by their inability to visualize cartilage.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a clinically targeted deep learning framework, the Swin-UNet conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN), for the automatic segmentation of femoral and tibial cartilage in MRI. We then evaluated its performance against conventional UNet, UNet cGAN, and Swin-UNet baseline models.

methodsOur dataset comprised 232 knee MRI scans. We conducted quantitative experiments on the proposed Swin-UNet cGAN model and compared the results with those of widely used UNet, UNet cGAN, and Swin-UNet models for femoral and tibial cartilage segmentation, using the Dice similarity coefficient, mean intersection over union, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, and average symmetric surface distance. All performance metrics were statistically analyzed. In addition, the performance of the Swin-UNet cGAN model was evaluated on an external validation dataset.

resultsThe proposed Swin-UNet cGAN achieved the highest mean Dice similarity coefficient and intersection over union scores for both femoral and tibial cartilage segmentation, demonstrating performance statistically comparable to the best-performing baseline (UNet) in the tibia. Regarding distance metrics (average symmetric surface distance and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance), the proposed model significantly outperformed all baselines in the tibia while achieving results comparable to the UNet cGAN in the femur. It also maintained consistently high segmentation performance on both the internal test set and an external validation dataset.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the proposed Swin-UNet cGAN achieves more accurate knee cartilage segmentation than UNet, UNet cGAN, and Swin-UNet, particularly in terms of boundary accuracy, while maintaining promising generalizability performance across both internal testing and external validation cohorts. This MRI-based deep learning approach addresses critical limitations of computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation systems by providing cartilage visualization, potentially improving surgical precision and outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingDeep LearningGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumanscartilagedeep learninggenerative adversarial networkknee cartilage segmentationmagnetic resonance imagingMRIsegmentationswim-UNet

Identifiers

PMID41771536
PMCPMC12993272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.