Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2026
Neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (SURE-02): a single-arm, phase 2 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05535218 (SURE-02_An Open Label, Single-arm, Phase 2 Study of Perioperative Pembrolizumab Plus Sacituzumab Govitecan, and Bladder-saving Approach, for Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Who Cannot Receive or Refuse Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SURE-02_An Open Label, Single-arm, Phase 2 Study of Perioperative Pembrolizumab Plus Sacituzumab Govitecan, and Bladder-saving Approach, for Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Who Cannot Receive or Refuse Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the immunological effects of antibody-drug conjugates.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Interpreting the 39% clinical complete response rate in SURE-02: why the assessment pathway matters.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond surgical technique: modifiable risk factors and evolving treatment paradigms in bladder cancer surgery.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of perioperative systemic therapies for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Comment to: "Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma by urinary diversion type".World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Systemic induction therapy and the expanding frontier of bladder preservation in MIBC.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Novel Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Antibody-Drug Conjugate Approaches in the Perioperative Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to antibody-drug conjugates in bladder cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibitors for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard-of-care treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, approximately 50% of patients are ineligible for or refuse neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and sacituzumab govitecan have shown activity as monotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We aimed to evaluate the clinical activity of neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab and adjuvant pembrolizumab, within a bladder-sparing approach.
methodsSURE-02 is a single-arm, phase 2 study, conducted at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed muscle-invasive bladder cancer (stage cT2-T3bN0M0), were deemed ineligible for or declined cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and were scheduled for radical cystectomy. Patients received four cycles of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 and intravenous sacituzumab govitecan 7·5 mg/kg on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks, followed by radical cystectomy or redo-transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (re-TURBT; after multidisciplinary tumour board discussion in patients who refused to undergo radical cystectomy) and 13 cycles of postsurgical pembrolizumab 200 mg, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical complete response rate, defined as negative imaging and no viable tumour at re-TURBT in patients not undergoing radical cystectomy. Efficacy was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had a baseline evaluation (intention-to-treat population). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05535218, and is active but not recruiting.
findingsBetween Oct 2, 2023, and Feb 26, 2025, 63 patients were screened, 49 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 61-71]; eight [16%] female and 41 [84%] male; 48 [98%] White and one [2%] Black) were enrolled, treated, and evaluated for safety and efficacy. 33 (67%) had a cT2 stage, 21 (43%) had a centrally confirmed variant histology. After a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR 8-18), 19 (39% [95% CI 25-54]) patients had a clinical complete response; all of whom underwent a re-TURBT. All patients with clinical complete response were metastasis-free; two patients developed an intravesical relapse. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse-events occurred in eight patients (16%), the most common being diarrhoea (in four [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in three patients (6%); bullous pemphigoid in two and colitis in one patient respectively.
interpretationPerioperative sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab revealed a promising clinical complete response rate, without the occurrence of grade 4 or higher adverse events, allowing a bladder preservation with sustained remission in approximately 40% of patients.
fundingMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA and Gilead Sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41771275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.