ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2026
Exacerbations and Decreased Lung Function Predict Nebulizer Use and Uptake in COPD and Tobacco Exposed Persons With Preserved Spirometry
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale: Nebulizers are an alternative to handheld devices for inhaled therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Understanding nebulizer utilization patterns is essential to developing therapy guidelines. Objectives: We aimed to describe characteristics of nebulizer users versus nonusers and factors associated with baseline nebulizer use and longitudinal uptake. Methods: We analyzed the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study, a prospective cohort of 2973 participants with or without tobacco use and/or COPD. We used cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression and interval-censored proportional hazard models to analyze factors associated with nebulizer use and uptake among tobacco-exposed participants with preserved spirometry (TEPS) and COPD from enrollment (Visit 1) through 4–7 years of follow-up (Visit 5). Results: Nebulizer utilization was highest in advanced COPD, 49% of Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Group D participants at baseline. Nebulizer treatments were primarily as-needed short-acting bronchodilators. Baseline nebulizer use was associated with respiratory exacerbations in the prior year (1, odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.24, 2.64]; 2, OR 1.86, 95% CI [1.07, 3.22]; 3 or more, OR 1.87, 95% CI [1.07, 3.28]), lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (OR 2.81 per liter decrease, 95% CI [2.09, 3.77]), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score >10 (OR 1.89, 95% CI [1.17, 3.03]), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (OR 1.03 per 10 meter lower 6MWD, 95% CI [1.02, 1.05]), and a history of asthma (OR 2.41, 95% CI [1.76, 3.30]). Longitudinal uptake was similarly associated with exacerbations, lower FEV1, CAT score >10, and asthma. Patterns were consistent between TEPS and COPD. Conclusion: Nebulizers were predominantly used by participants with frequent exacerbations, high symptom burden, and advanced COPD, and long-acting nebulized medications were underutilized. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare nebulizers with hand-held devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.