Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771189›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2026

MedFusionT5: Cross-Modal Attention Boosts Semantic Quality and Reduces Hallucinations in Dental AI.

Hamida Abdaoui, Sabri Barbaria, Ismail Dergaa, Halil İbrahim Ceylan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Andrea de Giorgio, Ridha Ben Salah, Hanene Boussi Rahmouni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hamida AbdaouiLaboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis (ISTMT), University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sabri BarbariaLaboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis (ISTMT), University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ismail DergaaHigh Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia.
Halil İbrahim CeylanPhysical Education of Sports Teaching Department, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye. Electronic address: halil.ceylan@atauni.edu.tr.
Nicola Luigi BragazziDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. Electronic address: nicola.bragazzi@uni-saarland.de.
Andrea de GiorgioArtificial Engineering, Naples, Italy.
Ridha Ben SalahLaboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis (ISTMT), University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hanene Boussi RahmouniLaboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis (ISTMT), University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia; The Computer Science Research Centre, the University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsAutomated dental report generation faces significant challenges in multimodal fusion, often resulting in suboptimal semantic quality and risks of hallucination, where AI generates clinically unsupported content. Current approaches that rely on simple feature concatenation or bidirectional attention mechanisms fail to effectively capture visual-textual relationships in medical imaging. This study aims to develop MedFusionT5, a unidirectional cross-modal alignment framework that (1) achieves superior clinical report quality through focused attention between visual patches and clinical text representations, and (2) ensures exceptional factual consistency by minimising hallucination rates.

methodsWe implemented a novel architecture that integrates vision transformer (ViT) for patch-based visual feature extraction with Bio_ClinicalBERT for clinical text encoding. The core innovation is a unidirectional multihead attention alignment module that selectively maps textual embeddings to relevant visual patches before multimodal fusion. A T5-base decoder then generates diagnostic reports from the aligned representations. We evaluated performance on 700 dental panoramic radiographs using comprehensive metrics, including BLEU, ROUGE, CIDEr, clinical precision/recall, and specialised hallucination analysis, comparing against both concatenation and coattention baselines.

resultsMedFusionT5 demonstrated superior performance across all evaluated metrics. Compared to the coattention baseline, CIDEr increased by 122% (5.65 vs 2.54) and by 320% over simple concatenation. BLEU-4 reached 0.865, outperforming both baselines, while maintaining the lowest hallucination rate at 2.42% (39% reduction vs coattention, 46% vs concatenation). The model achieved an optimal balance between precision (0.982) and recall (0.923), with 90% of reports exhibiting near-zero hallucination. Notably, MedFusionT5 showed consistent quality independent of report length (r = -0.022), unlike coattention's length-dependent performance (r = +0.795).

conclusionMedFusionT5 establishes a new state-of-the-art in automated dental report generation, demonstrating that unidirectional cross-modal alignment achieves superior semantic quality and clinical precision while minimising hallucinations. This work identifies unidirectional attention as the optimal alignment strategy for medical AI, providing a foundation for trustworthy clinical deployment where both accuracy and reliability are paramount.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDental RecordsHallucinationsHumansIntelligent SystemsRadiography, PanoramicSemanticsDental AIHallucination controlMedical report generationMultimodal alignment

Identifiers

PMID41771189
PMCPMC12966729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.