Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770809›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Access to information in deaf and hard-of-hearing people.

Eva Gutierrez-Sigut, Veronica Lamarche, Katherine Rowley, Emilio Ferreiro Lago, María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro, Ixone Saenz, Berta Frigola, Santiago Frigola, Delfina Aliaga, Laura Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva Gutierrez-SigutDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-2138
Veronica LamarcheDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Katherine RowleyDCAL Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emilio Ferreiro LagoUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
María Jesús Pardo-GuijarroUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Ixone SaenzUniversity Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain.
Berta FrigolaBarcelona, Spain.
Santiago FrigolaUniversity Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain.
Delfina AliagaUniversity Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain.
Laura GoldbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deaf and Hard of Hearing (HoH) people often face communication barriers that limit their access to crucial information. This study investigates which modalities deaf people used to gather information from various sources, and which factors predicted accessibility, satisfaction, and wellbeing. We report the findings from an accessible survey study, released in two written and three signed languages. Responses from 395 deaf/HoH UK and Spanish residents were collected online shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. We investigated whether the onset and Level of Deafness, knowledge of sign language, Residence, and self-assessed reading skill predicted the frequency with which they found accessible information, their satisfaction levels with the information accessed, and their physical and mental health. We found that most deaf/HoH people relied on subtitles to access information from the government and the news, but when signed information was available (i.e., from deaf organisations), SL was the preferred modality of access. Our main finding was that reading skill was a key predictor, with less skilled readers being at a disadvantage, less satisfied, and having lower health outcomes. Our findings advocate for facilitating more signed information, as well as releasing written information at appropriate reading levels and improving literacy programmes for deaf people.

Indexed as

Access to InformationCOVID-19DeafnessPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAdultAgedCommunication BarriersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReadingSARS-CoV-2Sign LanguageSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41770809
PMCPMC12952599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.