Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770806›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Stakeholder priorities and conceptualization of One Health: Insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping and grounded theory.

Evan F Griffith, Angela Opondoh, Catherine Kaluwa, Erenius Lochede Nakadio, Kipkorir Rotich, Job Ronoh Kipkemoi, Jonah Levin, Jacob Mutua, Siobhan M Mor, Janetrix Hellen Amuguni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evan F GriffithCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-1215
Angela OpondohNEOH - The Network for Ecohealth and One Health, Deurne, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-4486
Catherine KaluwaDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Erenius Lochede NakadioCounty One Health Unit, Turkana County Government, Lodwar, Kenya.
Kipkorir RotichCounty One Health Unit, Turkana County Government, Lodwar, Kenya.
Job Ronoh KipkemoiCounty One Health Unit, Turkana County Government, Lodwar, Kenya.
Jonah LevinCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jacob MutuaCounty One Health Unit, Turkana County Government, Lodwar, Kenya.
Siobhan M MorUniversity of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Janetrix Hellen AmuguniCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One Health (OH) has gained global recognition as a framework and practice for addressing interconnected health and sustainability challenges, such as emerging infectious diseases, food insecurity and climate change. Yet its operationalization remains limited, in part due to persistent differences in how OH is conceptualized across sectors and knowledge systems, including Indigenous knowledge holders and environmental actors. To address these gaps, we applied a mixed methods approach that combined fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) with grounded theory (GT) to examine stakeholder priorities and conceptualization of OH in Turkana County, Kenya. Thirty-six fuzzy cognitive maps were co-developed with community members, frontline workers, health, veterinary, and NGO stakeholders, then aggregated by group and analyzed using network metrics including normalized degree centrality and Jaccard similarity. Results revealed areas of alignment and convergence in OH conceptualization and perspective. Conceptually, the environment group map was the most distinct, while the health and NGO maps were the most similar. Environmental actors emphasized human-driven degradation, while community members described a pluralistic health system and the importance of wild foods, both absent from other group narratives. Shared priorities such as human and livestock health, nutrition, and water resources represent potential entry points for cross-sectoral integration. These findings demonstrate that barriers to OH operationalization are not only structural, but also shaped by differences in knowledge, experience, and problem framing across sectors and society within the socioecological system. Embedding ecosystem services, biodiversity, and traditional knowledge at the core of OH can enhance inclusivity and contextual relevance. Our integrated FCM-GT approach offers a transferable framework for participatory systems research, providing actionable insights for more inclusive and ecologically grounded OH implementation.

Indexed as

One HealthStakeholder ParticipationAnimalsFuzzy LogicGrounded TheoryHumansKenya

Identifiers

PMID41770806
PMCPMC12952644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.