ArticlePLoS biology2026
Dynamic expectation strength and precision shape human pain perception through shared and dissociable α-oscillatory mechanisms.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain Expectation in Individuals With High Autistic Traits: Decision-Evaluation Processes and Oxytocin Modulation.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Temporal Interference Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Produces Frequency-Dependent Analgesia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human pain perception is not solely driven by sensory input but is dynamically modulated by what we expect to feel and how confident we are in those expectations. Yet, the temporal mechanisms through which evolving expectations shape pain remain poorly understood. Here, we combined a probabilistic cueing paradigm with computational modeling and EEG to dissociate two core components of expectation: strength (a recency-weighted estimate of predicted pain) and precision (the inverse variability of recent predictions). Trial-wise strength estimates closely tracked subjective expectations and outperformed static cue labels, validating the model's psychological relevance. Expectation strength and precision exerted dissociable effects on pain processing: strength enhanced, whereas precision suppressed, pain-evoked responses. Critically, anticipatory α-band activity mediated these effects via distinct topographical patterns-expectation strength reduced fronto-central α power (reflecting heightened vigilance), while precision increased contralateral sensorimotor α-synchronization (supporting sensory gating). Source-level mediation analyses identified a right-lateralized dorsolateral prefrontal-sensorimotor cortices (DLPFC-SM1) integrating both components, with strength-specific engagement of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). These effects were supported by Bayesian inference and pooled mega-analyses, underscoring their robustness. Together, these findings highlight cortical α-oscillations as dual-control mechanisms for predictive integration, with DLPFC-SM1 as a shared expectation hub and mPFC as a strength-specific node. By moving beyond static cue-based models, this framework captures the adaptive dynamics of expectation and provides a neurocomputational foundation for targeted interventions in chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.