ArticlePloS one2026
Mountain moves: Spatial interaction modelling of Bulgaria's internal migration (1934-1992).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bulgaria experienced dramatic rural decline alongside rapid urban growth during the 20th century, shaped by both demographic pressures and socioeconomic change. Today, it remains one of Europe's fastest-declining populations, underlining the importance of understanding long-term migration dynamics. Understanding these migration dynamics is essential for interpreting the country's broader population shifts. This study provides a spatial analysis of internal migration in Bulgaria from 1934 to 1992. We construct a harmonised geocoded census settlement dataset, combining historical population records with geospatial settlement boundaries, road network data, and terrain ruggedness measures. Distances between settlements are calculated using both Euclidean and road-network measures, and terrain effects are quantified through terrain ruggedness indices. Migration flows are estimated using spatial interaction models (SIMs), parameterised by population scaling and distance decay functions. Model outputs are validated against historical benchmarks and aggregated regional flows, as well as on the settlement level, by intercensal period variability, ensuring robustness between the intercensal periods. Our analysis investigates the role of challenging topography in shaping migration flows, showing how mountainous landscapes constrained movement while facilitating concentrated urban growth. By integrating historical census records with spatial modelling and geospatial analysis, we uncover local migration dynamics that remain invisible at larger scales. Although our study does not offer direct policy advice, it provides a quantified geospatial perspective on historical context for contemporary policy debates and urban planning initiatives in a country that has experienced both significant rural decline and rapid urbanisation. The findings shed new light on Bulgaria's population history and provide a framework for understanding the interplay between landscape features and migration dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.