ArticlePloS one2026
Social inequities and clinical outcomes in young women with cervical cancer: Real-world evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the influence of social inequities and clinicopathological factors on survival outcomes in young women with cervical cancer treated at a comprehensive public cancer center in Brazil.
methodsThis retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of women aged 18-39 diagnosed with cervical cancer at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute between January 2017 and December 2021, assessing demographic characteristics and survival outcomes.
resultsThis analysis included 475 patients with a mean age of 33.6 years, with the majority being non-white (67.7%), never married women (68.0%), and having a low education level (< 8 years) (86.1%). Multivariate analysis indicated that a lower education level was associated with advanced stage (p = 0.001). Recurrence or progression occurred in 224 patients (47.2%), mainly as distant metastases (56.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.8 months, with two-year rates of 81.6%, 45.7%, 28.2%, and 6.2% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Shorter PFS was correlated with lower education level (p = 0.009), alcohol consumption (p = 0.026), undifferentiated carcinoma (p = 0.007), and advanced disease stage (p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was 35.1 months, with five-year rates of 82.9%, 42.7%, 23.7%, and 9.7% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Factors associated with shorter OS included lower education level (p = 0.005), undifferentiated carcinoma (p = 0.006), and advanced stage (p < 0.001).
conclusionUndifferentiated carcinomas and advanced stages negatively influence the prognosis of young women with cervical cancer. Social factors may also be correlated with poorer outcomes, especially alcohol consumption and lower education levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.