SynthesisJAMA internal medicine2026
Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral GLP-1RA TERN-601 for Adults With Obesity/Overweight: Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Ascending-Dose, Phase 1 and 2 Studies.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Trial
- Semaglutide Injection Once-Weekly for Weight Management in Adults: Results From A Randomized Phase III, Active-Controlled Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · on this mapTrial
- Oral small molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist aleniglipron in people with overweight or obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of orforglipron in adults with body mass index of 27 to less than 30 kg/mObesity pillars · 2026Article
- Medicaid Coverage Withdrawal and Dispensing of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity.Cureus · 2026Article
- Sex, Not Age, Predicts Weight Loss Outcomes With Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Real-World vs. Randomized Trial Evidence for Incretin-Based Therapies: A Narrative Review.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- Cardiometabolic and Renal Outcomes in Semaglutide Users with Type 2 Diabetes Achieving Glycemic and Weight Goals: An Observational Cohort Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Observational
- Balancing the benefits and risks of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a clinical guide for shared decision-making.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A SUSTAIN-6 Post Hoc Analysis by Weight Loss Category.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Predictors of treatment response to semaglutide for weight management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of semaglutide for obesity and hyperphagia in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a novel class of therapeutics approved to treat chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and/or obesity. However, whether GLP-1 RAs' efficacy varies by age, sex, race and ethnicity, baseline body mass index (BMI), and baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is unclear. Objective: To quantify the heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) of GLP-1 RAs, including semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, lixisenatide, and dulaglutide, by patient characteristics. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception through July 26, 2024. Study Selection: Pairs of investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and then reviewed eligible full-text articles reporting on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared GLP-1 RAs to placebo or other medications. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study design, interventions, and comparators, and patient baseline weight and weight change over time (overall and by age, sex, race and ethnicity, BMI, and HbA1c level) were extracted from the data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. For each subgroup, RCTs were meta-analyzed where quantitative synthesis was possible, while additional relevant studies were narratively incorporated in the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in body weight measured in kg (by age, baseline BMI, baseline HbA1c) or percentage change from baseline (by sex, race and ethnicity). Results: Of 7705 unique records, 41 articles representing 64 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 48 RCTs could be individually characterized: they had a mean (SD) study population of 1181 (2513) participants; 51 trials were parallel (98.1%); 51 multicenter (98.1%); and 21 evaluated semaglutide (43.8%) and 9, dulaglutide (18.8%). HTE was most commonly evaluated using baseline BMI (36 RCTs [75.0%]), HbA1c (24 [50.0%]), and age (21 [43.8%]), and less commonly, ethnicity (12 [25.0%]), race (11 [22.9%]), and sex (10 [20.8%]). Among 6 trials (19 906 patients) analyzed by sex, weight loss was greater among women (10.9%; 95% CI, 7.0%-14.8%) than men (6.8%; 95% CI, 4.6%-9.0%). We found no significant HTE by age (7 trials with 4314 patients), race (9 trials, 25 229 patients), ethnicity (7 trials, 8328 patients), baseline BMI (15 trials, 9473 patients across 3 analyses), or baseline HbA1c (4 trials, 1886 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, GLP-1 RAs produced greater weight loss among women than men; however, their efficacy was consistent across other important subpopulations. These findings may inform clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.