Trial reportJAMA neurology2026
Catheter Ablation and Oral Anticoagulation for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: The STABLED Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03777631 (STroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter ABLation and EDoxaban for Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
STroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter ABLation and EDoxaban for Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: STABLED Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Sinus Rhythm: Rhythm Control and Mechanism-Based Secondary Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Review
- Clarification to Table 3.JAMA neurology · 2026Article
- Discontinuing Oral Anticoagulation after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Time for a Paradigm Shift?US cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Among patients with atrial fibrillation, those with a recent stroke are at significantly higher risk of recurrence than those without. Catheter ablation is expected to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, heart failure, and mortality in these patients. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation added to standard therapy for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or composite outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent history of stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Stroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter Ablation and Edoxaban for Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (STABLED) study was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients were enrolled from January 2018 to March 2021 and observed until March 2024. This study was conducted at 45 sites in Japan. Patients aged 20 years or older and 85 years or younger and those with a definitive diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram, a history of ischemic stroke, currently receiving or scheduled to receive edoxaban, and having a modified Rankin Scale score of 3 or less were enrolled. Study data were analyzed from September 2024 to July 2025. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive standard therapy or standard therapy plus catheter ablation (after ≥4 weeks of edoxaban, within 1-6 months of index stroke onset). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure. Safety related to the catheter ablation procedure was assessed. Results: A total of 251 patients were enrolled and 249 (mean [SD] age, 71.7 [7.5] years; 187 male [75.1%]) were randomized (standard therapy, 124; standard therapy plus catheter ablation, 125). Median follow-up was greater than 3 years. The primary end point occurred at rates of 4.9% and 5.6% per person-year (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.62-2.01) with standard therapy vs catheter ablation, respectively. The respective mortality rates were 1.0 and 2.8 per 100 person-years. Two ablation-related adverse events (cardiac tamponade, stroke) were reported (0.8% each). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke history, standard therapy plus catheter ablation did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary composite end point. The observed event rate was lower than anticipated, suggesting that the study was underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03777631.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.