ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Social information processing in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurvivors of pediatric brain tumors (BT) experience significant, long-term adverse treatment-related effects, such as social deficits-which can impact academic achievement, quality of life, and daily adaptive functioning. Affective processing remains underexplored. This study investigated social affective processing in survivors compared to healthy children (HC), identified clinical and sociodemographic factors that may be related to affective processing, and explored whether cognitive-executive function mediates these relationships.
methodsSurvivors (N = 33, 54.5% female, mean [SD] age = 13.94 [3.28] years) and HC (N = 35, 48.6% female, age = 11.61 [2.96] years) completed behavioral assessments and questionnaires examining affective processing (emotion perception, emotion recognition, and theory of mind), cognitive-executive processes (executive function and inattention), and sociodemographic information (sex, income, parent education, and parent age). Mann-Whitney U compared social affective processing between survivors and HC. Correlations and linear regression examined relationships between predictors of interest and affective processing.
resultsSurvivors performed worse than HC on emotion perception (Z = -2.13, p = .033), but not other social affective tasks. Regression analysis revealed that receiving radiation was associated with poorer emotion perception (t = -3.45, p = .002) and higher inattention scores (t = 2.48, p = .020) while greater time since diagnosis was not. DISCUSSION: Emotion perception is a key component of social information processing and appears compromised in BT survivors, especially those who received radiation therapy, compared to HC. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These novel findings highlight potential affective mechanisms underlying social deficits in BT survivors and underscore the need for early screening and targeted interventions to enhance their social well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41770512What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.