ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2026
A practical 10-step recipe for conducting radiomic studies.
Review in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomics is a growing field in medical imaging that transforms images into high-dimensional quantitative data, offering insights into disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning. Using advanced computational techniques, radiomics uncovers patterns invisible to the human eye, playing a key role in precision medicine. However, the adoption of radiomics faces several barriers, including a lack of standardization, reproducibility challenges, and difficulties in clinical implementation. To address these challenges, a practical 10-step recipe is proposed to guide researchers in conducting effective radiomic studies: (1) identify a genuine clinical need and application; (2) establish a comprehensive database; (3) implement robust quality assurance and preprocessing; (4) ensure accurate image segmentation; (5) extract quantitative imaging features; (6) prioritize feature selection and dimension reduction; (7) consider integration of clinical and multi-omics data; (8) construct predictive models with machine learning techniques; (9) evaluate model performance using appropriate metrics; (10) translate models into clinical practice and workflow integration. This recipe emphasizes research rationale and methodologies, ensuring that the studies are aligned with real clinical needs, employing advanced techniques, and promoting reproducibility. By addressing these challenges through a structured approach, radiomics can transition from a research discipline to a clinical tool, contributing to more personalized and effective patient care. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A structured 10-step framework is proposed to guide radiomic research, addressing key challenges in standardization and implementation. This practical guide supports any professional aiming to start in radiomics or adopt best practices, promoting reproducibility and clinical relevance in precision imaging workflows. KEY POINTS: Radiomics extracts quantitative data from medical images for improved diagnosis and treatment. Reproducibility, standardization issues, and clinical implementation barriers are among the main challenges of the technique. Data quality, feature selection, and machine learning are key to meaningful analysis. A structured 10-step guide for conducting reliable radiomic studies is proposed, taking a step toward a standardized workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.