ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Clinical Trials in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing countries bear 93% of the global disease burden yet host less than 5% of clinical trials, limiting treatment generalizability and access. A 2018 systematic review catalogued key barriers to conducting clinical trials in developing countries, but their persistence and the evolution of solutions have since not being assessed. This review determines whether barriers identified by Alemayehu et al. (2018) persist in recent literature and synthesizes emerging facilitators and solutions. We systematically searched four databases for studies published after 2015 reporting barriers or facilitators to clinical trials in developing countries. A hybrid thematic analysis mapped data onto the prior framework while allowing new themes to emerge. Barriers were categorized by trial phase (pre-, during, post-trial). Of 942 records screened, 18 studies were included. Quantitative mapping revealed varied persistence: lack of infrastructure and skilled personnel showed moderate persistence (5/18 studies), while most 2018 sub-themes (e.g., regulatory delays) showed low persistence (3/18 studies). The literature’s focus may have shifted, with sociocultural beliefs and mistrust emerging as a dominant, highly persistent sub-theme (9/18 studies). Correspondingly, reported solutions are increasingly community-engaged and adaptive, including Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) to improve consent, partnerships with traditional healers, mobile clinics, and regulatory harmonization models. While foundational systemic barriers endure, contemporary discourse emphasizes overcoming sociocultural mistrust through community partnership. Advancing equity requires dual investment in research infrastructure (e.g., digital infrastructure, efficient ethics review) and a fundamental shift from conducting trials in to with communities, centering local voices as partners in global health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41770484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.