ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Diagnostic value of prostate magnetic resonance imaging in men with prostate-specific antigen levels ≥ 15 ng/mL for biopsy decision-making.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in new ultrasound technologies in targeted prostate biopsy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the value of MRI in men with highly elevated PSA values for the exclusion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective bicenter cohort study, consecutive men with PSA values ≥ 15 ng/mL and multiparametric (mp) MRI were included. We excluded patients with acute prostatitis and patients without histopathology or follow-up. Examinations were evaluated regarding MRI quality, PSAD, and PI-RADS classification. For all patients with subsequent biopsy, PC and csPC detection rates were determined. In a subgroup analysis, patients with and without the presence of csPC were compared regarding clinical and MRI parameters.
resultsFinally, 376 patients (median PSA 20 ng/mL) were included. MRI quality was excellent (median PI-QUAL 3). 26% of the patients revealed an MRI with a PI-RADS category 2, 16% were classified as category 3, 12% PI-RADS 4, and 46% showed a PI-RADS 5. A total of 280 patients underwent systematic screening with or without targeted prostate biopsy. Among these, 42% with PSA values ranging from 15 to 116 ng/mL (median 19.5 ng/mL) showed no presence of PC. Overall, csPC detection rates were 94% for PI-RADS 5 and 51% for PI-RADS 4. No csPC were identified in PI-RADS 2, and 8% in PI-RADS 3. Comparative analysis between patients with and without csPC revealed significant differences in age, PSA, PSAD, and PI-RADS (p ≤ 0.05).
conclusionsmpMRI demonstrated excellent performance in the detection of csPC in this high-risk cohort with PSA levels ≥ 15 ng/mL. High-quality MRI helps to exclude csPC in cases with significantly elevated PSA levels to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: mpMRI demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy for csPCs in men with PSA ≥ 15 ng/mL, and in cases of non-suspicious MRI findings, it can avoid unnecessary biopsies in these patients at risk. KEY POINTS: MpMRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in men with PSA values of ≥ 15 ng/mL. MpMRI enables the reliable exclusion of csPC in cases with non-suspicious MRI findings in these patients. In patients with significantly elevated PSA levels, mpMRI provides an effective risk stratification to avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.