ArticleProgress in orthodontics2026
Deep learning-based identification and maturation assessment of the zygomaticomaxillary suture in cone-beam computed tomography images.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study addresses maxillary deficiency management by developing a deep learning-based system for zygomaticomaxillary suture assessment. As the maturation status serves as a pivotal indicator for optimal maxillary protraction timing, its accurate evaluation is crucial for treatment success. The proposed cone-beam computed tomography-based system overcomes current limitations of subjective manual staging, offering quantitative and reproducible maturation analysis to guide clinically critical decisions in maxillary protraction therapy.
methodsA dataset of 505 cone-beam computed tomography scans was collected and annotated by three orthodontists to locate and stage the suture. Data augmentation and various loss functions were applied to optimize the model. The framework employs dual-network architecture: (1) 3D U-Net for precise suture identification, followed by (2) 3D ResNet50-based classification network for maturation stage prediction. Model performance was validated using multi-dimensional metrics including classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve values from the receiver operating characteristic curve, with benchmark comparisons against expert evaluators' assessments.
resultsThe model assessment took about 46 s for two tasks. 3D U-Net showed an average Euclidean distance of 2.31 ± 1.57 mm between the located and annotated zygomaticomaxillary suture centers. For classification tasks, the two-stage (ABC/DE) task had an accuracy of 0.922 and an F1-score of 0.921; the three-stage (A/BC/DE) task had an accuracy of 0.833 and an F1-score of 0.838; and the five-stage (A/B/C/D/E) task had an accuracy of 0.611 and an F1-score of 0.604.
conclusionThe dual-network deep learning system can automatically locate and assess the maturation of the zygomaticomaxillary suture in three dimensions from CBCT files, providing a critical foundation for clinical decision-making in maxillary protraction therapy. This deep learning-model improves diagnostic workflow by reducing assessment time and minimizing inter-observer variability, providing clinicians with a reliable and reproducible reference for optimal maxillary protraction timing-avoiding over-treatment of the very young (stage A) while ensuring timely intervention before sutural closure (stages D and E).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.