ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Where Does the Argument of Chinese Unaccusative Verbs Initially Map? An Analysis Based on the fMRI Study.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The initial mapping position of the Chinese unaccusative verb’s argument has been widely debated. To analyze this issue, the present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare neural processing mechanisms among: (a) unaccusative NP-V forms, (b) unaccusative V-NP forms and (c) verb-object structures (base-generated structures). Experimental results indicate that unaccusative V-NP forms showed significantly greater activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG, BA44), the left middle temporal gyrus (LMTG, BA21), the left inferior parietal lobe (LIPL, BA40) and the left superior parietal lobe (LSPL, BA7), which reflected the processing of derived structures with an argument’s syntactic movement, compared with the other two structures. Meanwhile, no significant difference was found between unaccusative NP-V forms and verb-object structures. These results suggest that: (1) unaccusative NP-V forms are base-generated structures similar to basic verb-object structures; (2) unaccusative V-NP forms are derived structures whose argument undergoes a syntactic movement from the subject position to the postverbal focus position. These findings indicate that the argument of Chinese unaccusative verbs initially maps to the subject position rather than the object position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41770453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.