Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770426›Full record

ReviewNatural products and bioprospecting2026

Nature meets machine: the AI renaissance in natural product drug discovery.

Rajesh Muthuraj, Jaikanth Chandrasekaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural products and bioprospecting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajesh MuthurajDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-7307
Jaikanth ChandrasekaranDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, 600116, Tamil Nadu, India. jaikanthjai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-9683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products (NPs) have long served as a cornerstone of drug discovery, yielding landmark therapeutics such as paclitaxel and artemisinin and providing sustained access to biologically relevant chemical space. Despite this legacy, NP-based discovery has gradually declined with the rise of synthetic chemistry and high-throughput screening, even as many contemporary "synthetic" drugs remain structurally inspired by natural scaffolds. Classical NP workflows-centered on phenotypic screening and bioassay-guided fractionation-continue to face persistent bottlenecks, including structural complexity, low bioactive yield, frequent rediscovery, and limited scalability. Rather than competing with NP research, artificial intelligence (AI) offers a complementary methodological framework to address these longstanding challenges. This review critically examines the bottlenecks inherent to traditional NP discovery and outlines how AI can be systematically integrated across the pipeline. We discuss AI-enabled advances ranging from natural language processing for mining ethnopharmacological knowledge to machine learning-driven dereplication, cheminformatics, and genome mining, with platforms such as GNPS2 exemplifying scalable progress. Case studies in antibiotic and anticancer discovery, as well as the modernization of traditional medicine, illustrate how AI-NP integration can accelerate early-stage discovery while enhancing translational relevance. Looking ahead, we examine emerging paradigms-including quantum machine learning, federated data ecosystems, and AI-assisted molecular design-that may further expand the scope of NP-based research. Collectively, this review presents a forward-looking framework in which AI functions not as a replacement for NP science, but as a synergistic discipline that enables more efficient, scalable, and informed exploration of nature-derived chemical diversity.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)CheminformaticsDereplicationDrug discoveryEthnopharmacologyMachine learningNatural products (NPs)Traditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID41770426
PMCPMC12953908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.