ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Vaginal Lengthening Procedures for Noncongenital Indications.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objectives of this video are to provide an overview of autologous grafts, flaps, and biologic grafts for use in vaginal lengthening procedures and to discuss management of shortened vaginal length with differing approaches.
methodsThis video reviews iatrogenic and medical causes of shortened vaginal length and management through conservative and surgical approaches. We discuss vaginal dilation-only protocols. We also describe surgical management with buccal grafts, split-thickness grafts, pudendal thigh flaps, and biologic grafts. The first case presents a patient with graft-versus-host disease who was managed via lysis of vaginal adhesions. The second case presents an iatrogenic shortened vaginal length with use of a split-thickness graft via a vaginal surgical approach. The third case presents a patient with a complex genitourinary sinus with upper vaginal obliteration who was managed via a robotics-assisted approach with a biologic graft for vaginal lengthening.
conclusionsCommon causes of shortened vaginal length are iatrogenic and medical etiologies that urogynecologists will see. As vaginal and minimally invasive surgeons, urogynecologists may consider acquiring grafting techniques or collaborative patient care to offer vaginal lengthening procedures to their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.