ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Effects of cognitive load-Induced constriction of the useful field of view on postural control.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the impact of temporary cognitive load-induced changes in the size of the useful visual field of view (UFOV) on postural control during a quiet stance.
methodsTwenty healthy young adults maintained a quiet stance on a stable or an unstable surface while performing cognitive tasks under three levels of difficulty. Cognitive tasks and visual stimuli to assess the size of the UFOV were presented on a screen. The sway area, mean velocity, and sample entropy of the center of pressure in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions were measured to assess postural control, and the reaction time to the visual stimulus was measured to assess the UFOV.
resultsThe reaction time to visual stimuli was significantly delayed (661 ± 61 to 841 ± 76 ms, mean ± standard deviation), meaning the size of the UFOV shrank, while performing the cognitive tasks on the unstable surface. Moreover, sway area, mean velocity, and sample entropy (0.06 ± 0.02 to 0.05 ± 0.02) were significantly reduced. However, a significantly increased sample entropy (0.08 ± 0.03 to 0.09 ± 0.03) and decreased mean velocity were observed under the most challenging cognitive condition. A significantly negative correlation was observed between the temporary changes in the size of the UFOV and sample entropy changes (rho = − 0.519).
conclusionThe stability of the support surface and cognitive loads may temporarily change the size of the UFOV, which may affect postural control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41770306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.