Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770057›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

CT protocols for lower limb arthroplasty: the Stanmore hip and knee protocols.

Angelika Ramesh, Anna Di Laura, Jennifer Gibson, Alister Hart, Johann Henckel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelika RameshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7396-4068
Anna Di LauraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer GibsonRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
Alister HartRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
Johann HenckelRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) enables 3D surgical planning for implant size and position, patient-specific instruments, and robotic-assisted lower limb joint replacement. Orthopaedic companies provide CT protocols tailored to specific implant systems and designs, including off-the-shelf and custom-made implants, leading to substantial variability in imaging guidelines for centres and hospitals. This study aims to consolidate CT imaging workflows through harmonised protocols that minimise ambiguity and enhance clarity, clinical practice and patient safety. A multidisciplinary team critically reviewed all 17 hip and 12 knee CT protocols that were available. Imaging elements were assessed, highlighting deficiencies and inconsistencies. These protocols informed the recommendation of five harmonised CT protocols through informal consensus: i) primary hip, ii) revision hip, iii) primary knee, iv) revision knee and v) total femoral replacement. Significant variability was found among company guidelines regarding scan volume, X-ray tube current, voltage and other parameters, resulting in inconsistent image quality and radiation exposure. Lack of harmonisation can lead to scan rejections and repeat imaging. The harmonised protocols prioritise high-resolution imaging with optimal parameters, reduced scan volume and minimal metal artefacts. Designed to be clear, concise, consistent and comprehensive, these user-friendly protocols effectively capture key anatomical structures, landmarks and alignment details crucial for planning and monitoring lower limb arthroplasty. The protocols are sufficiently flexible to accommodate both standard and customised implant planning requirements. These protocols streamline the imaging process, fostering alignment across companies by consolidating existing protocols; they reduce duplication and eliminate inconsistencies, without redefining the content or intent of the original protocols.

Indexed as

computed tomographyCT protocolharmonisationhip arthroplastyknee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41770057
PMCPMC12974730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.