ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
CT protocols for lower limb arthroplasty: the Stanmore hip and knee protocols.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven preoperative CT 3D planning: a narrative review on improving the accuracy of acetabular cup angle and size in total hip arthroplasty.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) enables 3D surgical planning for implant size and position, patient-specific instruments, and robotic-assisted lower limb joint replacement. Orthopaedic companies provide CT protocols tailored to specific implant systems and designs, including off-the-shelf and custom-made implants, leading to substantial variability in imaging guidelines for centres and hospitals. This study aims to consolidate CT imaging workflows through harmonised protocols that minimise ambiguity and enhance clarity, clinical practice and patient safety. A multidisciplinary team critically reviewed all 17 hip and 12 knee CT protocols that were available. Imaging elements were assessed, highlighting deficiencies and inconsistencies. These protocols informed the recommendation of five harmonised CT protocols through informal consensus: i) primary hip, ii) revision hip, iii) primary knee, iv) revision knee and v) total femoral replacement. Significant variability was found among company guidelines regarding scan volume, X-ray tube current, voltage and other parameters, resulting in inconsistent image quality and radiation exposure. Lack of harmonisation can lead to scan rejections and repeat imaging. The harmonised protocols prioritise high-resolution imaging with optimal parameters, reduced scan volume and minimal metal artefacts. Designed to be clear, concise, consistent and comprehensive, these user-friendly protocols effectively capture key anatomical structures, landmarks and alignment details crucial for planning and monitoring lower limb arthroplasty. The protocols are sufficiently flexible to accommodate both standard and customised implant planning requirements. These protocols streamline the imaging process, fostering alignment across companies by consolidating existing protocols; they reduce duplication and eliminate inconsistencies, without redefining the content or intent of the original protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.