SynthesisEFORT open reviews2026
Systematic review of the effect of insertion torque on locking screw performance.
Synthesis in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Locking plates are well established as a powerful plating concept, especially in low-density bone. Construct strength is dependent on the fixation between the screw head and the plate; however, the influence of variations in the torque used to engage the screw head into the plate hole is unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effect of insertion torque on the performance of locking screws. Methods: A systematic review was performed with electronic searches of four databases using free and MeSH search terms. Systematic evaluation and data extraction was performed up to 2 April 2025. The principal outcome was the difference in failure load for the locking plate construct following variation of the insertion torque. Results: The initial search identified 894 potentially relevant studies, of which six were eligible for inclusion. All were in vitro, biomechanical studies. Both stainless steel and titanium plates were tested. The former material showed no consistent performance increase with increased insertion torque in either pushout or cantilever testing. Titanium plates showed an increased pushout force and cantilever strength with more torque for some, but not all designs. Once screw head engagement in the plate hole was achieved, further torque was not clearly beneficial. Conclusion: Increased insertion torque, beyond that required to seat the screw head, did not consistently show performance benefits. Most studies were underpowered and may not be representative of clinical failures. Further work to define optimum torque ranges for locking plate systems is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.