ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
Tactical use of irrigants in open orthopaedic procedures: 'what to use & when'.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Antimicrobial Brachytherapy" Protocol for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Case Series with 2-Year Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) pose formidable challenges to healthcare resources. Surgical wound irrigation is a crucial step in reducing microbial bioburden in open orthopaedic procedures, yet there remains ambiguity regarding optimal use of lavage agents. For tactical selection of irrigants, orthopaedic wounds can be classified into three major categories (aseptic, acute septic and chronic septic) based upon microbial bioload and presence or absence of biofilm upon implanted hardware and/or musculoskeletal tissues. Irrigant products can be stratified based upon their modes of action: single modal (dilutional), dual modal (dilutional and chemical) and multi-modal (dilutional with multiple mechanisms). Host toxicity is commensurate with increased complexity of an irrigant product. A tailored, stepwise strategy of irrigant selection aligned with wound type is recommended, escalating from simple low toxicity dilutional lavage for low microbial bioloads to potent multi-modal chemical agents for biofilm-laden chronic infections. The method of irrigant delivery and selected volume are integral to wound lavage. The difference between methods is the impact pressure to host tissues and the depth of fluid penetration. Higher impact pressures clear adherent bacteria and foreign debris albeit the cost of host tissue damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.