ArticleJournal of vision2026
Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the flash-grab effect, an object flashed on a moving background appears to be shifted in the direction of the motion. The same background motion also distorts the flashed object's perceived shape. An even greater shift in the perceived location is produced by the frame effect, raising the question of whether it also produces a shape distortion. This phenomenon is important because the frame effect has been linked to perceptual stabilization during eye movements where the whole visual field acts as the frame. We found that, unlike the flash-grab case, shape was preserved for the frame effect to a much greater extent than for the flash-grab. Next, we tested the extent to which shape distortions could be predicted from the size of the shifts in position of individual shape elements. We found that observed distortions were weaker than predicted distortions for the frame effect, but stronger for the flash-grab stimulus. Finally, we examined whether the greater shape distortion for the flash-grab was due to the nature of the background motion (rotation vs. translation) or the aperture within which the background motion was presented (circular vs. rectangular). We found that both factors contributed to greater shape distortion. Our findings show that motion-induced shape distortions are not solely based on the individual position shifts of the shape elements when tested in isolation. The shape preservation for the frame effect may be achieved through engaging shape-based mechanisms tuned to the dynamics of saccadic eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.