Trial reportMedical education online2026
Integrating formative and summative feedback in online situational judgement tests: effects of feedback design on medical students' motivational and cognitive learning factors.
Trial report in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessment plays an important role in teaching and learning medical communication. Formative assessment is increasingly recognised as a crucial tool for improving learning outcomes and supporting competence development. In this study, we developed and evaluated different versions of automated formative and summative feedback in an online situational judgement test of basic medical communication competence.
methodsWe developed four versions of task-based (formative) feedback, differing in their enrichment strategies (i.e. reflection prompts or expert explanations) and the timing of the feedback (i.e. immediate feedback or post-test feedback), and one performance-based (summative) version featuring a test-score profile. In a randomised controlled trial with
resultsPlanned contrast analysis revealed that task-based feedback was not consistently more effective than performance-based feedback across all outcomes (
conclusionsThe results highlight the complexity of determining an optimal feedback approach, as different implementations can have differential effects on the motivational and cognitive factors that further shape learning processes. The findings suggest that an optimal feedback approach depends on specific learning outcomes and student characteristics, highlighting the importance of careful selection of feedback strategies tailored to specific educational goals and contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.